Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

NO1 [

Y-DNA Haplogroup NO1 [

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig NO1 [

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup NO1 is an internal branch of the broader NO lineage within K2, a major paternal lineage that sits upstream of the widely distributed haplogroups N and O. Because NO1 is an intermediate clade rather than a widely sampled terminal branch, its importance lies in reconstructing the deep evolutionary history of northern Eurasian paternal lineages. The most plausible placement for NO1 is in Upper Paleolithic northern Eurasia, where ancestral populations occupied a broad zone spanning parts of Siberia and adjacent steppe-forest regions.

The estimated age of this lineage, around 45 thousand years ago, is consistent with the late Upper Paleolithic diversification of K-derived lineages in Eurasia. While direct ancient-DNA sampling of NO1 itself is limited, its phylogenetic position suggests that it represents a crucial stage before the split that eventually produced the major descendant lineages N and O. These descendants later underwent very different demographic histories: N expanded strongly in northern Eurasia, while O became one of the dominant paternal lineages across East and Southeast Asia.

Subclades

As an intermediate haplogroup, NO1 is primarily relevant as a phylogenetic ancestor rather than as a well-characterized population lineage with many documented modern subclades. In practice, its study depends on the structure of downstream branches and on ancient lineages that help anchor the timing and geography of the NO radiation.

Key downstream relationships include:

  • Haplogroup N, associated with major expansions in Siberia, northern Eurasia, and Uralic-speaking populations.
  • Haplogroup O, associated with broad expansions in East Asia, Southeast Asia, and many Austronesian, Sino-Tibetan, and Austroasiatic populations.

Because NO1 is ancestral to these major branches, it serves as an informative node for understanding how a northern Eurasian paternal lineage gave rise to two of the most geographically extensive Y-DNA clades in Eurasia.

Geographical Distribution

There is no strong evidence that NO1 itself is common in modern populations, but its descendant lineages are widely distributed across Eurasia. By inference, the ancestral NO1 lineage is relevant to populations that preserve deep northern Eurasian ancestry or that are historically connected to the spread of N and O.

Major regional patterns include:

  • North Eurasia and Siberia, where downstream N lineages are frequent and ancient ancestry components are prominent.
  • East Asia, where the descendants of the NO radiation include very common Y-chromosome lineages.
  • Southeast Asia, especially through the widespread success of haplogroup O.
  • Uralic-associated populations in northern Europe and western Siberia, due to expansions of haplogroup N.
  • Ancient northern Eurasian populations, which likely preserved early branching paternal diversity prior to later Holocene demographic shifts.

Historical and Cultural Significance

The historical significance of NO1 is primarily deep prehistorical rather than directly tied to a single named archaeological culture. It represents an early paternal lineage within the broader Eurasian population history that predates the major cultural formations of the Holocene.

Its descendant branches are associated with major prehistoric and historic expansions:

  • Haplogroup N is often linked with Siberian and Uralic expansions, including movements into northern Europe and the forest zone of northern Eurasia.
  • Haplogroup O is associated with the spread of Neolithic and post-Neolithic East Asian populations, including the demographic expansions that shaped many agricultural and coastal societies in East and Southeast Asia.

Although NO1 itself is not typically assigned to a specific archaeological culture, it is important in the broader narrative of how paternal lineages diversified in northern Eurasia before radiating into some of the world’s most populous regions.

Conclusion

Y-DNA haplogroup NO1 is a deep, ancestral branch of the paternal tree that connects the upstream K2 lineage to the major Eurasian haplogroups N and O. Its significance lies in its role as a window into the Upper Paleolithic origins of northern Eurasian paternal diversity and the later demographic processes that spread descendant lineages across northern Eurasia, East Asia, and Southeast Asia.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis NO1 [. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 NO1 [ Aktuell ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 1 0 0
2 NO1 ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 1 41 0
3 NO ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 4 801 12
Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

North Eurasia

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup NO1 haplogroup NO1 is found include:

  1. Ancient northern Eurasian populations carrying ancestral NO-related lineages
  2. Siberian populations, especially those associated with downstream haplogroup N diversity
  3. East Asian populations, especially through the later expansion of haplogroup O
  4. Southeast Asian populations where haplogroup O reached high frequencies
  5. Uralic-associated populations in northern Eurasia through descendant N lineages

Regionale Präsenz

Southeast Asia High
East Asia Moderate
Northeast Asia / Siberia Low
Central Asia Low
Northern Europe Low
South Asia Low
Northeast Asia Moderate
Southeast Asia Moderate
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~50k Jahre zurück

    Jungpaläolithikum

    Fortgeschrittene Werkzeuge, Kunst und kulturelle Vielfalt

  2. ~45k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe NO1 [

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  3. ~20k Jahre zurück

    Letztes glaziales Maximum

    Höhepunkt der letzten Eiszeit, isolierte Bevölkerungen

  4. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  5. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  6. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  7. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  8. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig NO1 [

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu NO1 [. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

China_Sitaimengguying_EN Early Buryat Lena River Culture Lokomotiv Culture Russia_AltaiKrai_N Shamanka Culture
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.